Members requiring directors to call a general meeting: timing (CA 2006 ss.303-304)
Yusuf holds ordinary shares representing 7% of the paid-up voting share capital of Thornbury Organics Ltd, a private company limited by shares. The directors have ignored his informal suggestions that the shareholders should consider appointing an additional director. Yusuf now sends the company a properly authenticated request that the directors call a general meeting. The request states the general nature of the business and sets out the text of an ordinary resolution to appoint the new director, which may properly be moved.
What must the directors do once the company has received Yusuf's request?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer B: Call a general meeting within 21 days of becoming subject to the requirement, to be held not more than 28 days after the date of the notice.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
Members holding 5% of paid-up voting capital can require a general meeting; directors must call it within 21 days, for a date not more than 28 days after the notice (CA 2006 ss.303-304).
Members requiring directors to call a general meeting: timing (CA 2006 ss.303-304)
Section 303(1) CA 2006 allows members to require the directors to call a general meeting. The directors must do so once the company receives requests from members representing at least 5% of the paid-up capital carrying the right to vote at general meetings (s.303(2)). Yusuf holds 7%, and his request states the general nature of the business and includes a resolution that may properly be moved (s.303(4)), so the directors are bound to act. Section 304(1) then sets the timetable: the directors must call the meeting within 21 days from the date on which they become subject to the requirement, and the meeting must be held on a date not more than 28 days after the date of the notice convening it. Because the request includes a resolution, the notice of the meeting must include notice of that resolution (s.304(2)).
Why A is wrong: The periods are reversed: the meeting must be called within 21 days and held not more than 28 days after the notice.
Why C is wrong: The threshold in s.303(2) is 5% of the paid-up voting capital, which Yusuf's 7% exceeds.
Why D is wrong: Section 303 requires a general meeting to be called; members who want a written resolution must use the separate s.292 procedure.
Why E is wrong: Private companies are not generally required to hold AGMs, and s.304 fixes a specific timetable for the requisitioned meeting.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Substantial property transactions with a director: members' approval (CA 2006 ss.190-191)
Which of the following best describes what the Companies Act 2006 requires before Kestrel Joinery Ltd buys the van?
Written special resolution: 75% of total voting rights of eligible members (CA 2006 ss.21, 283)
What is the status of the written resolution?
Director's service contract over two years without members' approval (CA 2006 ss.188-189)
What is the effect of the failure to obtain the members' approval?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.