Allotting shares for cash in a single-class private company: s.550 authority and s.569 pre-emption
Fenwick & Sloane Ltd was incorporated in 2021. It is a private company limited by shares with only one class of shares (ordinary shares) and unamended model articles. The members have never passed any resolution about the allotment of shares or pre-emption rights. The directors want to allot 500 new ordinary shares to a new investor, Lucía, for £20 each in cash. They do not want to offer the shares to the existing shareholders first.
Which shareholder resolution(s), if any, are needed before the directors can make the allotment to Lucía?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer A: Only a special resolution disapplying the statutory pre-emption rights for the allotment.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
In a single-class private company, directors can allot under s.550 unless the articles prohibit it, but allotting for cash outside s.561 pre-emption requires a special resolution (or articles) under s.569.
Allotting shares for cash in a single-class private company: s.550 authority and s.569 pre-emption
Two separate questions arise: whether the directors have authority to allot, and whether the statutory pre-emption rights must be followed. On authority, s.550 CA 2006 provides that where a private company has only one class of shares, the directors may allot shares of that class except to the extent that the articles prohibit it. The model articles contain no such prohibition, so no ordinary resolution under s.551 is needed. On pre-emption, s.561 requires a company that is allotting equity securities for cash to offer them first to existing ordinary shareholders in proportion to their holdings. The model articles do not exclude this. Under s.569, the directors of a private company with only one class of shares may be given power, by the articles or by special resolution, to allot as if s.561 did not apply. The only resolution needed is therefore a special resolution disapplying pre-emption.
Why B is wrong: Section 550 already gives the directors of a single-class private company power to allot, unless the articles prohibit it, so an ordinary resolution under s.551 is unnecessary.
Why C is wrong: Authority to allot is not the problem; without disapplication, s.561 requires the shares to be offered to existing shareholders first.
Why D is wrong: The model articles do not exclude the statutory pre-emption rights in s.561, so they must be disapplied by special resolution.
Why E is wrong: Lucía can take ordinary shares of the existing class; creating a new class is unnecessary and would not by itself remove the pre-emption rights.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Off-market buyback by written resolution: majority and seller's eligibility (CA 2006 ss.694-695)
Which statement correctly describes the members' approval needed?
Substantial property transactions with a director: members' approval (CA 2006 ss.190-191)
Which of the following best describes what the Companies Act 2006 requires before Kestrel Joinery Ltd buys the van?
Written special resolution: 75% of total voting rights of eligible members (CA 2006 ss.21, 283)
What is the status of the written resolution?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.