LLP carrying on business with one member for more than six months (LLPA 2000 s.4A)
Ellery Fold LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England, had two members, Joaquín and Wren. Wren died on 1 January. Fully aware of her death, Joaquín carried on the LLP's business alone for the next ten months without admitting any new member. During that time the LLP incurred a debt of £20,000 to one supplier in February and a debt of £35,000 to another supplier in September. The LLP is now insolvent and both debts are unpaid.
What is Joaquín's personal liability for these debts?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer B: He is liable jointly and severally with the LLP for the September debt only.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
If an LLP carries on business with fewer than two members for over six months, a member who knows this is jointly and severally liable for debts contracted after those six months (LLPA 2000 s.4A).
LLP carrying on business with one member for more than six months (LLPA 2000 s.4A)
An LLP is a body corporate with legal personality separate from its members (s.1(2) LLPA 2000), so its members are not normally liable for its debts. Section 4A is an exception. It applies where an LLP carries on business without having at least two members, and does so for more than six months. A person who is a member for the whole or any part of the period after those six months, and who knows the LLP is carrying on business with only one member, is liable jointly and severally with the LLP. That liability covers debts contracted during that later period. The LLP had only one member from 1 January, so the six months ended at the start of July. The September debt was contracted after that, while Joaquín knew he was the only member, so he is personally liable for it. The February debt fell within the first six months and remains the LLP's debt alone.
Why A is wrong: Section 4A removes the protection of limited liability for debts contracted after an LLP has traded with one member for more than six months.
Why C is wrong: Liability under s.4A covers only debts contracted after the first six months of trading with one member, so it does not extend to the February debt.
Why D is wrong: The February debt fell within the first six months, which s.4A does not cover; the administration of Wren's estate is irrelevant.
Why E is wrong: Section 4A applies to any member who knows the LLP is trading with only one member; designated member status is irrelevant.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Changing the nature of a partnership business needs every partner's consent (Partnership Act 1890 s.24(8))
Which of the following best describes the legal position on the proposed change?
Substantial property transactions with a director: members' approval (CA 2006 ss.190-191)
Which of the following best describes what the Companies Act 2006 requires before Kestrel Joinery Ltd buys the van?
Declaring an interest in a proposed transaction (CA 2006 s.177)
Which of the following best describes Priya's duty under the Companies Act 2006?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.