Creditors' bankruptcy petition: aggregating debts to reach the bankruptcy level (IA 1986 ss.267-268)
Dariusz is a sole trader in England. He owes £3,200 to Mapleton Supplies Ltd and £2,100 to Sefton Hire Ltd. Both debts are unsecured, for liquidated sums and immediately payable. Four weeks ago each creditor served a statutory demand on Dariusz in the prescribed form. Neither demand has been paid, secured or compounded for, and Dariusz has made no application to set either aside. Assume the bankruptcy level is £5,000.
Can a bankruptcy petition be presented against Dariusz?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer E: Yes, the two creditors may present a joint petition, because their debts together total £5,300 and the other conditions are met.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
Creditors may jointly petition where their unsecured liquidated debts together reach the £5,000 bankruptcy level and inability to pay is shown, e.g. by an unpaid statutory demand (IA 1986 ss.267-268).
Creditors' bankruptcy petition: aggregating debts to reach the bankruptcy level (IA 1986 ss.267-268)
A creditor's petition may be presented in respect of 'one or more debts' by 'the petitioning creditor or each of the petitioning creditors' (s.267(1) IA 1986). Under s.267(2)(a), the amount of the debt, or the aggregate amount of the debts, must equal or exceed the bankruptcy level, which is £5,000 (s.267(4)). Together, the two debts total £5,300. Each is for a liquidated sum, unsecured and immediately payable (s.267(2)(b)). Dariusz appears unable to pay each debt because a statutory demand was served, at least three weeks have passed, and it has been neither complied with nor set aside (s.268(1)(a)). There is no outstanding application to set aside either demand (s.267(2)(d)). Mapleton and Sefton may therefore present a joint petition.
Why A is wrong: Section 267 allows debts owed to more than one petitioning creditor to be aggregated to reach the bankruptcy level.
Why B is wrong: A single creditor alone must be owed at least the bankruptcy level of £5,000; neither is.
Why C is wrong: An unpaid and unchallenged statutory demand is an alternative to unsatisfied enforcement of a judgment (s.268(1)(a) and (b)).
Why D is wrong: A debtor may apply for his own bankruptcy, but that does not prevent creditors from presenting a joint petition where the aggregate debt meets the bankruptcy level.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Order of payment from floating charge realisations in a liquidation (IA 1986 ss.175, 176A)
In what order will the liquidator apply the floating charge realisations?
Repaying a director's loan before liquidation: preference to a connected person (IA 1986 ss.239-240)
Can the liquidator challenge the repayment to Felix?
Floating charge granted to secure an existing overdraft before liquidation (IA 1986 s.245)
What is the status of the floating charge in the liquidation?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.