Limitation period for a claim in simple contract (Limitation Act 1980, s 5)
Tamsin Okafor runs a print studio in Bristol. Under a written contract (not a deed), Ellis Machinery Ltd agreed to deliver a new printing press to her studio on 3 May 2021, and she paid the full price in advance. The press was never delivered. Tamsin spent the next three years trying to source a replacement and only worked out the full extent of her lost profits in September 2024. She has now consulted a solicitor about suing Ellis for breach of contract.
What limitation period applies to Tamsin's claim?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer D: Six years from the date of the breach, when Ellis failed to deliver the press in May 2021.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
An action founded on simple contract must be brought within six years from accrual of the cause of action, which is the date of breach.
Limitation period for a claim in simple contract (Limitation Act 1980, s 5)
Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 provides that an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued. In contract, the cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, whether or not the claimant has yet suffered or discovered the full loss. Ellis broke the contract by failing to deliver the press on the agreed date in May 2021, so time began to run then. Tamsin must issue proceedings within six years of that breach. When she later quantified her lost profits does not affect when time runs. The contract was in writing but was not made by deed, so the 12-year period for actions on a specialty does not apply. The latent damage provisions (ss 14A and 14B) apply to actions for negligence, not to this claim for non-delivery.
Why A is wrong: The three-year 'date of knowledge' period in s 14A applies to latent damage in negligence, not to a contract claim for non-delivery.
Why B is wrong: Time in contract runs from the breach, not from when the claimant discovers or quantifies the loss.
Why C is wrong: Twelve years applies to actions on a specialty, such as a deed; a written contract that is not a deed is a simple contract.
Why E is wrong: The 15-year long-stop in s 14B applies only to negligence claims relying on s 14A.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Personal injury limitation for a claimant injured as a child (Limitation Act 1980, ss 11 and 28(6))
Ignoring the court's discretion to disapply the time limit, by when must proceedings for Leo's personal injury claim be issued?
Limitation for breach of trust: future interests and s.21(3) Limitation Act 1980
Is Quentin's claim time-barred?
Default judgment after an acknowledgment of service (CPR 10.3, 15.4, 12.3)
Which of the following best describes the position?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.