SQE Daily.

Failure to file a costs budget on time (CPR 3.13 and 3.14)

Dunmore Developments Ltd is the claimant in a Part 7 multi-track claim for £400,000 damages for breach of a construction contract. The claim, issued in the County Court at Nottingham in May 2026 and proceeding there, is not proceeding as Business and Property work and is not subject to any costs budgeting pilot scheme. The first costs and case management conference is listed for 15 July 2026. No order has been made dispensing with costs budgets or changing the time for filing them. Dunmore is legally represented, but its solicitors overlooked the deadline and did not file or exchange Dunmore's costs budget at least 21 days before the conference.

Unless the court otherwise orders, what is the consequence for Dunmore?

Choose one answer to see the reasoning.

  1. Dispute Resolution · FLK1No. L104

    Sanctions against a defendant who ignores a letter before claim (PD Pre-Action Conduct, para 16)

    Which of the following orders may the court make because of Brightwater's non-compliance?

  2. Dispute Resolution · FLK1No. 30

    Claimant fails to beat a defendant's Part 36 offer: costs consequences (CPR 36.17(1)(a) and (3))

    Which of the following best describes the order the court must make, unless it considers it unjust to do so?

  3. Dispute Resolution · FLK1No. L103

    Court's power to order ADR and costs consequences of refusing to engage (CPR 3.1(2)(o), 44.2(5)(e))

    Which of the following best describes the position?