Solicitor drafting a parent's will that leaves residue equally to the solicitor and siblings
Jonah Feld, a solicitor, is asked by his widowed mother to prepare a new will. It will make the same main provision as her existing will, which another firm drafted: her residuary estate is to pass to her three children, including Jonah, in equal shares. There are no unusual gifts. His siblings know of their mother's wishes and agree with them. His mother has full capacity and does not want to pay another firm.
Which of the following best describes whether Jonah may draft the will without his mother first taking independent legal advice?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer B: He may, if satisfied that in the circumstances his interest and relationship do not undermine his ability to advise, and be seen to advise, impartially.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A solicitor may sometimes draft a parent's will leaving residue equally to the solicitor and siblings without independent advice, but only if their interest does not undermine their ability to advise impartially.
Solicitor drafting a parent's will that leaves residue equally to the solicitor and siblings
Paragraph 6.1 of the Code prohibits acting where there is an own interest conflict or a significant risk of one. The SRA's wills guidance says that a solicitor drafting a will containing a significant gift to themselves should normally ensure that the client has first taken independent legal advice. However, the guidance accepts that there may be exceptions where the solicitor can continue without independent advice. Its example is a solicitor drafting a surviving parent's will that leaves the residuary estate to the solicitor and their siblings in equal shares. That is Jonah's situation. The provision is the even-handed division his mother already chose with another firm, and there is nothing unusual about it. Whether it is appropriate still depends on the circumstances, and Jonah must consider whether his financial interest or relationship undermines his ability to advise, and be seen to advise, impartially. He should keep a record of that judgement. If anything in the instructions departed from equal treatment in his favour, the position would change.
Why A is wrong: SRA guidance recognises exceptions, giving this very example: a surviving parent leaving residue to the solicitor and siblings in equal shares.
Why C is wrong: Witnessing would not address the conflict, and a gift to an attesting witness is generally void under s.15 Wills Act 1837.
Why D is wrong: The Code applies to work for relatives; the guidance treats this as a possible exception on the facts, not an exemption from the Code.
Why E is wrong: The guidance does not require him to forgo his share; the question is whether he can advise impartially in the circumstances.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Client wants to leave a significant gift to the solicitor drafting the will (Code 6.1)
How should Clara proceed?
Taking will instructions from a relative: acting only on the client's own instructions (SRA Code para 3.1)
Which of the following best describes how Laura should proceed under the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors?
Deceased client's son asks for her will and instructions before probate (Code 6.3)
What should the solicitor do?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.