CFA success fees are not recoverable from the losing opponent (CLSA 1990 s.58A(6))
Callum Fraser is considering bringing a High Court claim in England for breach of contract against a former supplier. His solicitor proposes a conditional fee agreement with a success fee of 50% of base costs, entered into now. Callum asks: 'If I win and the court orders the supplier to pay my costs, will the supplier also have to pay your success fee?'
Which of the following is the correct answer to Callum's question?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer C: No, because a costs order cannot require the supplier to pay any of a success fee due under a conditional fee agreement; Callum pays it himself.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A costs order may not require one party to pay all or part of another party's CFA success fee; the client pays it (Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 s.58A(6)).
CFA success fees are not recoverable from the losing opponent (CLSA 1990 s.58A(6))
Section 58A(6) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, as substituted by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, provides that a costs order made in proceedings may not include provision requiring the payment by one party of all or part of a success fee payable by another party under a conditional fee agreement. For an agreement entered into now, the success fee is therefore not recoverable from the supplier, even if Callum wins and obtains a costs order. Callum would remain liable to pay the success fee to his solicitor himself. In a contract claim the success fee is not subject to the personal injury damages cap, but it cannot exceed 100% of base costs, so a 50% success fee is permissible.
Why A is wrong: Since the 2012 reforms, a costs order cannot require the paying party to pay a success fee, however reasonable.
Why B is wrong: Notice to the opponent no longer makes a success fee recoverable; s.58A(6) bars recovery outright.
Why D is wrong: Success fees are permitted in commercial claims, up to 100% of base costs; the issue is only who pays.
Why E is wrong: There is no sharing rule; none of the success fee is recoverable from the opponent.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Personal injury CFA: success fee capped at 25% of damages excluding future loss (2013 Order)
What is the maximum success fee the firm may charge Nadia?
SRA Transparency Rules: which advertised service requires published cost information?
For which advertised service must the firm publish cost information on its website under the SRA Transparency Rules?
Damages-based agreements in employment claims: the 35% cap including VAT (DBA Regs reg 7)
What is the maximum payment the firm may receive from Aisha under the damages-based agreement?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.