Senedd Cymru legislative competence: provisions applying in relation to England (GoWA 2006 s.108A)
An Act of Senedd Cymru passed in 2025 regulates bus services. Section 12 of the Act requires every local authority in England whose area borders Wales to publish a cross-border bus timetable each year. The provision is not ancillary to any other provision. Cheshire-based campaigner Amira Haddad asks a solicitor whether the English local authorities are legally bound by section 12.
Which of the following best describes the legal position?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer D: Section 12 is not law, because it applies otherwise than in relation to Wales and so is outside the Senedd's legislative competence.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A provision of an Act of Senedd Cymru is not law so far as it applies otherwise than in relation to Wales, unless it is an ancillary provision within s.108A(3).
Senedd Cymru legislative competence: provisions applying in relation to England (GoWA 2006 s.108A)
Section 108A(1) of the Government of Wales Act 2006 provides that an Act of the Senedd is not law so far as any provision of it is outside the Senedd's legislative competence. Under s.108A(2), a provision is outside competence if, among other things, it extends otherwise than only to England and Wales (para (a)), or applies otherwise than in relation to Wales or imposes functions exercisable otherwise than in relation to Wales (para (b)). Section 12 extends to England and Wales, so para (a) is not the problem; but it imposes duties on English local authorities, so it applies otherwise than in relation to Wales. The exception in s.108A(3) for ancillary provisions does not apply, as the facts state section 12 is not ancillary. Section 12 is therefore outside competence and, by s.108A(1), is not law. The English authorities are not bound by it.
Why A is wrong: Extent and application are different: a Senedd Act extends to England and Wales but must apply only in relation to Wales (s.108A(2)(b)).
Why B is wrong: A provision outside competence is simply 'not law' under s.108A(1); no declaration of incompatibility is needed to deprive it of effect.
Why C is wrong: Section 107(3) protects against defects in Senedd procedure, not against a provision being outside legislative competence.
Why E is wrong: No repeal is needed; a provision outside competence never has the force of law.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Bilingual Acts of Senedd Cymru: equal status of the Welsh and English texts
Which of the following best describes the status of the two texts?
Legal status of the Sewel convention for Wales (GoWA 2006 s.107(6) and Miller)
Which of the following best describes the legal position?
Using Hansard to interpret a statute: the conditions in Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593
Which of the following best describes the extent to which the court may consider this Parliamentary material?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.