What the estate can recover (Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 s.1)
Callum, aged 38, was seriously injured in England in a crash caused by the negligence of a delivery driver. He spent three weeks in hospital in great pain and then died of his injuries. Before the accident he earned £60,000 a year and expected to work until 67. His executor brings a claim for the benefit of his estate under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934.
Which of the following heads of loss is NOT recoverable in the estate's claim?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer B: The earnings Callum would have received between his death and the age of 67.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A deceased's causes of action survive for his estate, but the estate cannot recover exemplary damages or loss of income for any period after death; funeral expenses may be included.
What the estate can recover (Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 s.1)
Under s.1(1) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934, causes of action vested in a person survive for the benefit of his estate on his death. The estate can therefore recover the losses Callum himself had suffered up to his death: damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity during the three weeks, the earnings he lost in that period, and the costs of his care and treatment. Section 1(2)(c) allows a sum for funeral expenses to be included where the death was caused by the wrong. However, s.1(2)(a)(ii) provides that the damages recoverable for the estate shall not include any damages for loss of income in respect of any period after the person's death. Callum's lost earnings after death up to 67 are therefore not recoverable by the estate. Any loss to his family from the loss of his financial support would instead be claimed by his dependants under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.
Why A is wrong: Section 1(2)(c) expressly allows a sum in respect of funeral expenses where the death was caused by the act giving rise to the claim.
Why C is wrong: Callum's own claim for pain, suffering and loss of amenity before death was vested in him and survives for his estate.
Why D is wrong: Earnings lost before death were part of Callum's own subsisting claim; only income for the period after death is excluded.
Why E is wrong: Pre-death care and treatment costs were Callum's own loss and survive for the benefit of the estate.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Who may claim bereavement damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 s.1A
Who is entitled to bereavement damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976?
Pure economic loss caused by a negligent act: power cut damages calculation (Spartan Steel)
Applying the leading authority on economic loss caused by a negligent act, how much is Forgewell likely to recover from the contractors?
Excluding liability for personal injury to a consumer visitor (Consumer Rights Act 2015 s.65)
Which of the following best describes the effect of the notice on Hannah's claim for her injury?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.