Limitation for breach of trust: future interests and s.21(3) Limitation Act 1980
A trust in England gives Pearl a life interest, with remainder to Quentin absolutely. In March 2017 the trustee, Rupert, honestly but negligently made an unauthorised investment, which lost much of its value. The loss was reported to both beneficiaries in June 2018. Rupert did not keep or receive any of the trust money himself, there was no fraud, and nothing was concealed. Pearl died in January 2025. In March 2026 Quentin issued proceedings against Rupert for the loss to the capital.
Is Quentin's claim time-barred?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer A: No, because time did not run against his future interest until it fell into possession on Pearl's death in January 2025.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
Claims for breach of trust must be brought within six years, but time does not run against a beneficiary with a future interest until it falls into possession (LA 1980 s.21(3)).
Limitation for breach of trust: future interests and s.21(3) Limitation Act 1980
Section 21(3) of the Limitation Act 1980 provides a six-year limitation period for an action by a beneficiary to recover trust property or in respect of any breach of trust, running from when the right of action accrued. It also provides that a right of action is not treated as accruing to a beneficiary entitled to a future interest until that interest falls into possession. Section 21(1) removes any limitation period only for fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, or to recover trust property from a trustee who holds or received it and converted it to his use. Neither applies, because Rupert was merely negligent and kept nothing. Quentin's remainder fell into possession on Pearl's death in January 2025. His six years therefore run from then, until January 2031, and his March 2026 claim is in time. A claim by Pearl, had she sued in 2026, would have been out of time, but her interest ended on her death.
Why B is wrong: Running time from the breach ignores the s.21(3) rule postponing accrual for future interests until they fall into possession.
Why C is wrong: Discovery is not the starting point under s.21(3), absent fraud, concealment or mistake under s.32, none of which arose.
Why D is wrong: Section 21(1) removes the limitation period only for fraud or recovery of trust property from the trustee, not for honest negligence.
Why E is wrong: The period under s.21(3) is six years, not twelve.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Limitation period for a claim in simple contract (Limitation Act 1980, s 5)
What limitation period applies to Tamsin's claim?
Personal injury limitation for a claimant injured as a child (Limitation Act 1980, ss 11 and 28(6))
Ignoring the court's discretion to disapply the time limit, by when must proceedings for Leo's personal injury claim be issued?
Relief from liability for breach of trust: Trustee Act 1925 s.61
On what basis may the court relieve Agnes from personal liability?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.