Privileged advice mistakenly sent by seller's solicitor: must the buyer be told? (Code 6.4(d))
Zainab Ali, a solicitor, acts for the buyer of a commercial unit. The seller's solicitors email her a set of replies to enquiries and mistakenly attach a letter of advice from the seller's counsel. The letter discusses a serious flooding risk that is not mentioned in the replies. Zainab realises at once that it is a privileged document that was sent to her by mistake.
Under paragraph 6.4 of the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, is Zainab obliged to tell her client what the letter says?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer C: No: that duty does not apply to information in a privileged document that she knows of only because it was mistakenly disclosed.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
The Code duty to tell the client all material information does not extend to information in a privileged document the solicitor knows of only because it was mistakenly disclosed.
Privileged advice mistakenly sent by seller's solicitor: must the buyer be told? (Code 6.4(d))
Paragraph 6.4 of the Code requires a solicitor acting for a client to make the client aware of all information material to the matter of which the solicitor has knowledge, subject to limited exceptions. Paragraph 6.4(d) excludes information 'contained in a privileged document that you have knowledge of only because it has been mistakenly disclosed'. Counsel's advice to the seller is privileged. Zainab knows its contents only because it was attached by mistake, and she realised this at once. So para 6.4 does not oblige her to tell her client what it says. The exception reflects the importance the law attaches to legal professional privilege. In practice she should tell the seller's solicitors about the error and not use the document. She remains free to protect her client by proper means, for example by raising general enquiries and arranging searches and surveys about flood risk, as she would in any commercial purchase.
Why A is wrong: Para 6.4(d) creates an express exception for information in a privileged document known only because it was mistakenly disclosed.
Why B is wrong: No such waiver features in para 6.4; the exception in 6.4(d) applies regardless.
Why D is wrong: The timing is irrelevant; para 6.4(d) means there is no duty to pass on the contents at all.
Why E is wrong: The method of passing on the information does not matter; the 6.4 duty does not arise for this information.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Acting for seller and buyer of a flat where terms are still to be negotiated (Code 6.2)
Which of the following best describes whether the firm may act for both?
Acting for buyer and lender when the buyer hides a cash-back from the lender (Code 1.4, 6.2)
Which of the following best describes the solicitor's position?
Acting against a former client whose confidential information you hold (SRA Code paras 6.3-6.5)
Which of the following best describes whether Ashby Cole LLP may act for Petra?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.