Paying an agency for referrals of defendants awaiting trial (Code 5.1(d))
A criminal defence firm is approached by an agency that offers to refer defendants who have been charged and are awaiting trial in the Crown Court. The firm would pay the agency £100 for each client referred. The agency says the clients would be told about the payment and that the arrangement would be recorded in a written agreement.
May the firm enter into this arrangement?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer D: No, because a firm must not make referral payments to an introducer for clients who are the subject of criminal proceedings.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A solicitor or firm must not make or receive referral payments in respect of clients who are the subject of criminal proceedings, whatever disclosure or written terms are offered.
Paying an agency for referrals of defendants awaiting trial (Code 5.1(d))
Paragraph 5.1 of the Code regulates referrals and introductions. Generally, clients must be told about any financial interest an introducer has, and any fee sharing agreement must be in writing. Paragraph 5.1(d), however, is an outright prohibition: a solicitor must not receive payments relating to a referral, or make payments to an introducer, in respect of clients who are the subject of criminal proceedings. Defendants who have been charged and are awaiting trial in the Crown Court are clearly the subject of criminal proceedings. The proposed £100 per client would be a payment to an introducer for referring them. Transparency with clients, a written agreement and the source of funding do not matter, because the protections in paras 5.1(a) to (c) apply only to arrangements that are permitted in the first place. Paragraph 7.1(b) of the Code of Conduct for Firms applies the same rule to the firm itself.
Why A is wrong: Telling the client cannot make lawful a payment that para 5.1(d) prohibits outright in criminal cases.
Why B is wrong: A written agreement is required for permitted fee sharing, but it does not authorise a referral payment that is prohibited.
Why C is wrong: The prohibition in para 5.1(d) applies however the payment is funded.
Why E is wrong: Para 5.1(d) covers all clients who are the subject of criminal proceedings, whether privately funded or legally aided.
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Sharing fees with an accountant who introduces company clients (Code 5.1)
Which of the following best describes what the Code requires in relation to this arrangement?
Acting for clients competing for the same objective (SRA Code 6.2)
Which of the following best describes whether the firm may act for both clients?
Client wants to leave a significant gift to the solicitor drafting the will (Code 6.1)
How should Clara proceed?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.