Change of use within Use Class E is not development (TCPA 1990, s.55(2)(f))
Marek Nowak is buying the freehold of a lock-up shop in Norwich, England, which has been used for the retail sale of clothing. He plans to turn it into a café where customers will mostly eat and drink on the premises. He will make only internal changes (new counters and seating) that will not affect the external appearance of the building. There are no planning conditions or other restrictions on use affecting the shop.
Does Marek need planning permission for the change from clothes shop to café?
Choose one answer to see the reasoning.
Worked answer
Correct answer D: No, because both uses fall within Use Class E, and a change of use within the same use class is not development.
THE RULE TO REMEMBER
A change of use between two purposes within the same class of the Use Classes Order is not development and needs no planning permission.
Change of use within Use Class E is not development (TCPA 1990, s.55(2)(f))
Planning permission is required only for development, defined in s.55(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as building, engineering, mining or other operations, or a material change of use. Section 55(2)(f) provides that where land is used for a purpose within a class specified in the Use Classes Order, using it for another purpose of the same class is not development. In England, Class E (Commercial, Business and Service) of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 covers both the retail sale of goods other than hot food (E(a)) and the sale of food and drink mostly consumed on the premises (E(b)). Marek's change from clothes shop to café is therefore not development and needs no planning permission. His internal works are also excluded from development by s.55(2)(a), as they affect only the interior and do not materially affect the external appearance. Building regulations may still apply to the works.
Why A is wrong: Section 55(2)(f) takes a change within the same use class outside the definition of development altogether.
Why B is wrong: Works affecting only the interior or not materially affecting external appearance are not development under s.55(2)(a).
Why C is wrong: Permitted development rights are relevant only to matters that are development; a change within Class E is not development at all.
Why E is wrong: A hot food takeaway is outside Class E, but Marek's café serves food mostly eaten on the premises, which is within Class E(b).
A little more practice done.
Related questions
Planning enforcement time limit for unauthorised building works in England (TCPA 1990, s.171B)
Which of the following best describes the position on planning enforcement?
Landlord's section 25 notice: timing, termination date and grounds of opposition (LTA 1954 s.25)
Which of the following best describes the requirements for Harbourside's section 25 notice?
Failure to complete and the notice to complete (SCS 5th ed, condition 6.8)
Which of the following best describes the effect of the notice to complete?
A GOOD HABIT, DELIVERED
Tomorrow's question.
In your inbox.
One free question a day, with the answer and reasoning.
No course pitches. Just your daily practice.